The pictures should I make a jump, for a photo shoot from a moving subway is not easy. Certainly not when you're in a tunnel under a road and only emerges through a small opening view on the Seine, as here.
We have now four weeks away. And only five days from February 27. On Tuesday, January 25 I wrote in " Flap Turd" (what's in a name?) That the Anthroposophical Society in the Netherlands festivities announced, in " 2011 - 150 years of Steiner ... " honor of Steiner's 150th birthday next Sunday. "More information will follow!" Thus ended that message. Has anyone seen this information?
Hogervorst John is certainly disappointment. He writes on the website AntroVista in "The Sorrow of the Netherlands??" (Found under the menu 'News').
"In three places, a lecture held later in the year there is a small conference. Great that it happens ... but not to write home about. "
Fortunately he knows the solution. Because:
"In Belgium, thanks to the efforts of mainly two (!) women a blast of a meeting. "
The website will hasten to come. The program looks impressive (though the blog very little effect). Friday February 25 from ten to eleven the inauguration of the three days in Castle of Schoten, near Antwerp:
"For 10 hours will be 25 young people, pupils of Steiner schools, the exhibition and the three-day opening. It will be a photogenic event, which symbolizes the freshness, joy and richness of this festive weekend. "
Beautiful, do you. From 11:00 to 11:30 there is a pause. And what I see from 11:30 to 12:30? Oh no, how can they do now!
"The Freedom Phenomenonreading Jos Verhulst, scientistWhat should conform to a human act as" free "to be true? Jos is the conditions and time goes briefly to the question: "Can those conditions had to be satisfied?" "
Does not anyone from there in Belgium? In order for such a party than be associated with Holocaust deniers and deniers? Of course everyone is entitled to "The Free Speech 'as I said on May 31, 2009 (I came on September 9 2009 back in 'Turn ). Also Jos Verhulst. But should that happens at a party in compliance? That gives it a very bad taste. I repeat once again the qualification Floris Schreve gave the evil ideas of Verhulst and his friends at 'The Bridge', 'neo-talkin'. Schreve also had a good opinion to anthroposophists and Anthroposophical Societies:
"But stand back, or make clear that these are not the opinions you are as a movement or organization behind it seems to me not too much to ask. "Anthroposophy is not promoting the ideas of David Irving or Ernst Zündel" seems a not too statement difficult. "
But no, still nothing has happened. So what remains time Flora wrote:
"Besides diving the same names of" scientists "/ Holocaust revisionists / outright neo-Nazis also in the contributions of Jos Verhulst on http://www.vrijgeestesleven.be . The problem is really something more metastases. It appears to me that a major problem for anthroposophy in the Dutch (including Dutch Anthroposophical institutions have no problem with these excesses, at least it has that appearance). "
It is not just a pain in the Netherlands, but also a Sorrow of Belgium ... That we know already by Hugo Claus. - Quickly go to something else. "Happy Birthday, Rudolf Steiner" reported the "Medien Anthroposophie Stelle" shown on Feb. 17. Two weeks before that a "Pressekonferenz" announced on that date, in fact, a discussion forum, with three new Steiner biographers. And today appears at News Network Anthroposophy (NNA), a detailed report back by Wolfgang G. Vögele, all three biographies have been reviewed under the title " Muss ein Ballett getanzt Forscher selbst haben?"
"Beim Kolloquium TRAF the new Steiner-biographer in Frankfurt on anthroposophy researchers and journalists.
discussions between anthroposophical scientists and the academic mainstream world do not happen that often. To mark the publication of new biographies of Rudolf Steiner (NNA) reported there was now such a meeting in the Frankfurt Goethe House. Had invited the Info3 editors and those it has launched Media Office anthroposophy.
met So the three authors, the historian Miriam Gebhardt and Helmut Zander, and the Mainz educationist Prof. Heiner Ullrich, inter alia, John Kiersch, Frank Reiter and Listening Prof. Jost Schieren of Alanus University in Alfter. At the colloquium also discussed with journalists.
Laura Kraut Kramer of the media office was in her welcoming pleased that three major German trade publishers Steiner 150th Birthday were important enough to bring out new biographies about him. That was a telling sign that Steiner's thought-provoking and outside the anthroposophical movement will be discussed and should. It quoted Mark Brüderlin, the director of the Kunstmuseum Wolfsburg: Steiner are now no longer just anthroposophists. This change documented in a hall built by Ramon Bruell designed an exhibition with bibliography: you saw books on Steiner's life course since 1925, about the cult and commemorative literature to present critical views.
In his introductory moderation turned Info3-chief Jens Heisterkamp out another one: as anthroposophist see not only the practice fields, but also the orientation of life posed by anthroposophy. The space defined by Steiner to knowledge goals to the Cosmic and represent an overcoming of self-centeredness, which is quite modern. Who should go this route, work on themselves.
In discussion it was learned, first some background to the three new Steiner-biographer. Helmut Zander said as he came on anthroposophy as the Virgin and child. At the University of contempt was the topic was, as he found it exciting. Over the years, he was employed so as in the pyramid scheme increased, because more and more requests came from academics who wanted to be informed in detail about Steiner. His dissertation, he wrote, because "the material was there." He was approached "with a dash of naivete" in the subject, without knowing which dimensions it would take time. There were about ten years an established esoteric research with highly diverse research fields, which have large open spaces contained. He had to admit "vulnerable": the Steiner birthday was for him "come too early." The publishers now lured with offers of money: the economic stimulus've played him for a role. Staying at Steiner was his "Imaginativkraft" which will also underestimated how he handled the ritual area.
Prof. Heiner Ullrich described his approach to Rudolf Steiner on the path of a dissertation on Waldorf schools in the 1980s was a boom as the schools. Have provoked and irritated him while the underlying theory, especially Steiner's anthropology, as well as the temperaments. This means a return to antiquated forms of knowledge. He was trying to understand Steiner's anthropology to the philosophy of Ernst Cassirer ago. Steiner was a common characteristic for 1900 "vague religiosity," which makes its way through Goethe to Theosophy understandable. Steiner's world view was a critique of modernity. His writings are no longer relevant, but the practice fields of anthroposophy. The interesting thing about the Waldorf education, the question of why they think his view, despite its questionable bases more new recipients. Therefore, he was curious social sciences to the first part, the present results of empirical studies, which also might be of interest to Waldorf schools. His book on Steiner should be a biography, but turn to parents who want their child to a Waldorf school.
Miriam Gebhardt found it remarkable that different departments are represented with different motivations on the podium. arise even from a family psychologist, she had had a classmate from the anthroposophical milieu. Discussions with him were always come up to a certain limit that they have experienced as a fraction. Personalisation was a psychological: Where Psychology and Anthroposophy away from each other? Its scientific base is the education and the human image was 100 years ago. For it was so special about Steiner that he, like Freud at the starting point of the "psychological age" stand. As of this he was based on a consideration of the history of mankind and finally come to a kind of therapy for certain cultural deficits. Steiner remain topical because the civilizational threat today is similar to Stone Age and was also the "work on himself" back in business.
When asked what was for him today, valuable in Steiner's work, "said Helmut Zander, his focus was Steiner's work with myths and metaphors. He would not say Final, only information for the use of Steiner type. He impressed, for example, such as anthroposophic doctors perceive the passage of a person. Prof. Ullrich was also the physiognomic point of view of human nature get something off, make them curious about the Waldorf education experts. Here, this represents a consensus with many non-anthroposophical approaches, in which lies a creative potential for educationalists.
Miriam Gebhardt said, staying at Steiner was his eclecticism. Two things to be feasible: either Anthroposophy as being: If you buy goods Demeter is set happiness. That this could be watered down but the anthroposophy, had already fears Steiner. Because of its wide Offer, he was known during his lifetime as a modern department store owner. His proposed spiritual path is not so easily digestible. Prof. Ullrich conceded, in reading of Steiner's writings to know where you stand, because there are always going to existential questions. "We stressed then, of course, rather the border where you can no longer, distancing himself and asks the same time: What excites you about it yet," said the scientist. Steiner challenged in any case self-reflection.
Whether the two-volume work by Christoph Lindenberg (1997) not long ago are present classical Steiner biography, said Jens Heisterkamp. Gebhardt said that any Generation discover their new Steiner, insofar Lindenberg was no longer likely to date. Today, people are increasingly required to understand "translations" from their strange world of anthroposophy, "added Ullrich. With the needs of their readers expecting book publishers and the media. Zander said, Lindenberg had been heavily criticized both inside and out. In the external perspective, such as in the perspective of the reviewer Thomas Steinfeld (FAZ), his work has been seen as unsuitable for public discussion. Much like the Catholics do not trust you even anthroposophists no objective, fair representation.
But internally Lindenberg has been criticized because he had dared to show by means of stepwise sources Steiner's access to Christianity, was thrown into the discussion. Listening Frank Reiter (Christian Community) emphasized the importance Lindenberg, who had slaughtered a lot of "holy cows", which had been thanked him but not of the anthroposophical movement. Heisterkamp finally certified Lindenberg those empathic mode of research, was advocated by Steiner. John Kiersch, who has known the deceased Steiner biographer Lindenberg was closer to remember, behind its apparent distance had a passionate love for Steiner confessed. Lindenberg was involved twice: destroying myths empathy and feel.
The Symposium on the afternoon Jens Heisterkamp then presented the question whether there might not be that it is for the public perception not only to science, arguing that rather Steiner, to be publicly presentable, must be seen differentiated - although one had to reckon with some cynical or ironic representations. Prof. Ullrich said that the public for "translations" from the world unknown to them (anthroposophy) of interest. The media wanted to meet the needs of their consumers.
a cult veneration towards Rudolf Steiner give it any more, fixed, Prof. Jost Schieren. On the other hand, it belongs to the general view of the present, highlighting the deficit. After that gauged the public credibility of a Steiner reception. This leads to the dilemma: the success of the practice fields would be upheld, but the theory behind it would be seen as deficient. This dilemma is still not solved both with Professor Ullrich as well as Helmut Zander felt.
Sebastian Jüngel, editor of the "Goetheanum", then threw to the three biographers often discussed in the anthroposophical movement question of the personal Relationship to Anthroposophy: "Can one write about ballet something valid, without ever having practiced ballet" The opposite was the anthropologist Anette Rein, that it had earned his doctorate on temple dances. You should not even have to exercise it can say something valid, political scientists should not be a politician, not a musicologist piano virtuoso. Especially the strange view might be the more accurate.
Controversies also became the subject of truth. Jean Claude Lin criticized Zander lacked the sense of truth, the question of truth could not be excluded by Steiner. Ansgar Martins, young author of Info3 pointed out that there is obviously different truth bounced ideas clashed. Helmut Zander Lin responded that once you get into the anthroposophical milieu, one would responded to the question of truth or to existential questions. Science can not claim to truth.
Stephan Stockmar by the magazine "The Three" asked: I take Steiner's scientific claim seriously? Steiner draw on knowledge of knowing what Helmut Zander and criticize bespöttele. Of these, a neutral reader would be surprised. The tone Zanders he described as angry. He acted as if he's not seriously object of research. Frank Reiter Listening accused Zander, His book contains too many assumptions. Despite some recognition would be denied Steiner subjective honesty. Helmut Zander commented that he "incorporate interpretations. He graduated from this mistake not, they were part of the Science.
clearly than before it was today that the idealist Steiner, after a period of dropping out was (as an atheist, etc.) picked up the thread again. In this respect he considered Steiner a systematic thinker. Miriam Gebhardt understood the Steiner attributed eclecticism not devaluing as arbitrariness. Steiner had received orders for life and tries to answer questions. Prof. Ullrich Steiner finally looked at a "continuity in Transition "in Goethe's sense. Steiner also had a result in the most varied connections possible: "No one came on the same track to Steiner," he said.
Prof. Ullrich finally picked out the search for common ground between academic science and anthroposophy, he think about the educational ideas Steiner, in the humanistic attitude and in the alternative treatment of nature.
Laura Kraut Kramer expressed the hope for the media point to a continuation of the conversation. This stands as a contact person available to all who turn not directly to the Goetheanum Meinte oder wollten, mit den Vorstand der Zentrale Dornacher klarzukommen cousin. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment